First off, I should point out that there are some glaring lapses in my collection; notably, in the D&D line there's a jump from 1981 (Moldvay) to 2001 (Hackmaster--the "Never Say Never Again" of Big D), and only one of the numbered editions are included: the recent Basic Rules associated with v. 5. I'm not a complete Luddite (yes I am), I do have several knockoffs--Tunnels & Trolls, DragonQuest, SwordBearer--and retroclones--Castles & Crusades, OSRIC, Swords & Wizardry: White Box and Complete, DCC (perhaps more of a knockoff than a retroclone)--on hand. Labia Lords was omitted from the study because, with such a silly name, I just can't take it seriously. Also missing: Mentzer; because... well, it's better left unsaid.
There are, of course, some basic similarities throughout the majority of the versions. For instance, we all know that haffies are about 3' tall, they tend to be dexterous, stealthy, and crack shots with various missilery. It's also generally agreed that they tend to be hardily resistant to magic and perhaps also poison--usually manifested in a saving throw bonus--and most of the rules include factors such as these in their descriptions of the pesky little critters.
"Hey little dude: What's up with your feet?" |
Also, over time haffie hardiness seems to have migrated quite a bit. At first they were resistant to magic, then poison jumped on the bandwagon, in the form of heightened saving throws. Some of this disappeared in some editions and versions, but then, inexplicably it resurfaced in Castles & Crusades and Fiver Basic as fearlessness. This is in shocking contrast to, say, Moldvays haffers who were described as somewhat cowardly. While I am deeply and unabashedly ignorant of post-Gygaxian mainline D&D rules, I have read enough to understand--perhaps errantly--that at some point halflings lost there spot as a default player race to the Kender of Dragonlance; the race that single-handedly ruined everything they touched back in the mid-80s.** Anyway, my point is that I have a sinking suspicion that the fearlessness thing is a kender trait rather than a hobbit trait, which makes me more than a little queasy. On a possibly related note, nothing in particular is said of halfling feet in Fiver.
* The only illustration of a hairy footed haffer in the core AD&D rulebooks that is clearly linked to halflings is the one in the one accompanying the Halfing description in the AD&D Monster Manual. Though there is also a short hairy footed dude in that party of characters in the marginal illustrations in the back of the AD&D DMG
** Delta Dan has statistically proven that the reason Walter Mondale failed so utterly in his 1984 presidential campaign--winning only 2 states, if I recall correctly--is that the Reagan camp leaked rumors that Mondale was "pro-Kender." More recently, Mitt Romney saw his presidential hopes go up in flames when a photo of him relaxing on the beach beside a now-middle-aged and paunchy Tasslehoff Burrfoot hit the internet. Also: those faulty O-rings that caused the Space Shuttle Columbia disaster? Manufactured by Kender.
The illustration of a halfling in the Rules Cyclopedia (1991, illustration by Terry Dykstra, p. 27 RC) shows the guy with extremely hairy feet. The text mentions the feature nowhere, neither does the monster description. Haflings are a good class to play in the RC and are no cowards (morale of 8, 10 if a leader (level 2 qualifies ...) is present).
ReplyDeleteThis being a Hobbitfest, I'd like to point you to the loving words I wrote about them in 2012:
http://the-disoriented-ranger.blogspot.de/2012/11/why-not-to-extinguish-halflings-part-1.html
Hope there's more to come! But no more about them Kender, please. No more, I say!
Thanks for helping to fill in part of the gaping chasm in my research! And thanks also for your contribution to Hobbitfest. If I find some more old posts on the topic, I may do a halfling-love link farm.
ReplyDeleteAlso: no more kender!
Excellent. And the Roslof illustration always tweaked me regarding the prohibition for 'large' weapons for halflings. Of course they would have polearms or similar- they would just be cut down to size.
ReplyDeleteWhich is why my boggies will be a bunch of insular buggers, ready to go full Viet-cong on your ass if you have the temerity to invade their burrow-holds. If you somehow get them to make a stand in the open, be prepared to face infantry squares of horse-gutting halberdiers and slingers. So there.
Tolkien originally meant for Bilbo to get boots in Rivendell and wear them for the rest of the quest; you can see this in many of his illustrations. He later realized he forgot to include this in the text.
ReplyDeleteSee here for more discussion:
Bilbo's Boots
Well that explains why he was wearing boots on the cover of the Ballantine paperback edition from the 70s that I cut my teeth on. Nice work as always ZA.
ReplyDelete